---------- Původní e-mail ---------- Od: Komu: ok1teh Datum: 22. 6. 2018 11:56:17 Předmět: ok1gth phd Ahoj... Dostali jsme info, ze v disertacni praci OK1GTH se vyskytuji reseni, ktere publikoval YU1AW, aniz by autor disertacni prace uvedl odkaz na zdroj. A ze se to srbskym radioamaterum nelibi. Povazujeme to za trapnou situaci. Bohuzel resení neni na strane spravcu webu OK2KKW. We received an info, that published copy of the phd thesis work of OK1GTH use some design solution, published before by YU1AW although links to such resource were not used. And such situation some serbian radioamateurs consider as not very likeable. We think it as an embarrassing situation. Unfortunately solution of it is not on the side of OK2KKW web editors. OK1TEH --------------------------------- Dodatek z 25.6: OK1GTH se vyjadril, že jde o nedorozumení a ze souhlas od YU1AW dostal uz pred nekolika lety. A napsal: "Z hlediska citacnich pravidel byla jedna z uvedených konstrukci (civkovy anodovy obvod - myslenkovy puvod YU1AW) radne ocitovana v diplomove praci vcetne odkazu na webove stranky YU1AW na prvnim miste a v disertacni praci byla uvedena citace na tuto diplomovou praci. Tudiz byly dodrzeny citacni pravidla. OK1GTH" Add.from 25.6: OK1GTH wrote, that it is a missunderstanding and he got an approval from YU1AW already few years ago. And the next day Tomas sent: From the perspective of citation rules one of the described designs (plate circuit with use of coil - idea of YU1AW) has properly quoted incl.link to YU1AW web in my previous thesis work and in last phd thesis work is citation to the previous document. From this perspective I am convinced of regularity of the citation rules. OK1GTH --------------------------------- last addition by OK1VPZ on 27.6.